Talk:Resource - Revision history

XLambda at 11:27, 28 July 2013

2013-07-28T11:27:31Z

Psyringe at 09:33, 27 July 2013

2013-07-27T09:33:44Z

Noppa354 at 23:28, 26 July 2013

2013-07-26T23:28:26Z

Ibanix: Created page with "Why did someone use templates here? Each resource doesn't need a template."

2013-06-07T04:53:57Z

Created page with "Why did someone use templates here? Each resource doesn't need a template."

New page

Why did someone use templates here? Each resource doesn't need a template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 28 July 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I'm afraid I don't see the merit in deleting pages about important concepts and putting the information into one humongous list. This wiki should help people understand the game. The usual player start playing one or two classes (most are locked anyway) and then gradually expand to others. As such, new players need information specifically about the resources that are relevant for their current games. It doesn't help them if we bury this information in a long list of resources, most of which they don't even have access to yet. I think it would be a much better solution to keep the individual pages for the resources, and have one general "resources" page that highlights their differences. I suggest reverting the dozen page deletions, or giving a better rationale for those. So far, the only argument is that several of the individual pages were small. In a rather young wiki which will have its pages growing for a long time to come, I don't see this as a convincing argument. [[User:Psyringe\|Psyringe]] ([[User talk:Psyringe\|talk]]) 09:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)		I'm afraid I don't see the merit in deleting pages about important concepts and putting the information into one humongous list. This wiki should help people understand the game. The usual player start playing one or two classes (most are locked anyway) and then gradually expand to others. As such, new players need information specifically about the resources that are relevant for their current games. It doesn't help them if we bury this information in a long list of resources, most of which they don't even have access to yet. I think it would be a much better solution to keep the individual pages for the resources, and have one general "resources" page that highlights their differences. I suggest reverting the dozen page deletions, or giving a better rationale for those. So far, the only argument is that several of the individual pages were small. In a rather young wiki which will have its pages growing for a long time to come, I don't see this as a convincing argument. [[User:Psyringe\|Psyringe]] ([[User talk:Psyringe\|talk]]) 09:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I agree. I will restore the individual resource pages, at least until someone comes up with a better or more elegant solution. [[User:XLambda\|XLambda]] ([[User talk:XLambda\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:33, 27 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Fixed that, hoping for deletion of those pages used as templates.		Fixed that, hoping for deletion of those pages used as templates.
		+
		+	I'm afraid I don't see the merit in deleting pages about important concepts and putting the information into one humongous list. This wiki should help people understand the game. The usual player start playing one or two classes (most are locked anyway) and then gradually expand to others. As such, new players need information specifically about the resources that are relevant for their current games. It doesn't help them if we bury this information in a long list of resources, most of which they don't even have access to yet. I think it would be a much better solution to keep the individual pages for the resources, and have one general "resources" page that highlights their differences. I suggest reverting the dozen page deletions, or giving a better rationale for those. So far, the only argument is that several of the individual pages were small. In a rather young wiki which will have its pages growing for a long time to come, I don't see this as a convincing argument. [[User:Psyringe\|Psyringe]] ([[User talk:Psyringe\|talk]]) 09:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 26 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why did someone use templates here? Each resource doesn't need a template.		Why did someone use templates here? Each resource doesn't need a template.
		+
		+	Fixed that, hoping for deletion of those pages used as templates.